|
Originally published in "The" Dive Shop
Newsletter, © John Wall and "The" Dive Shop, all rights reserved
When new
divers think of underwater imaging, they generally think of still photography
instead of video. This is usually because their primary exposure (no pun
intended) to underwater images are the still photos that they see in magazines.
They
may also assume that video is more expensive. This is not true. Consider the
cost of purchasing, developing, and mounting slide film. If an underwater
photographer shoots 20 rolls of film on a dive trip, he’ll spend an additional
$300. Experienced photographers typically keep only three images from each roll.
That translates to a cost of $5 per usable image.
That
$5/image, however, is the apparent cost. It does not take into account
psychological and environment costs. For example:
- Still photography is difficult to master
- New divers often have a difficult time controlling
their buoyancy while diving
with a camera
- New underwater still photographers are frequently
frustrated by the poor results caused by the previous points
To improve their results,
new underwater photographers who are not familiar with the fragility of the
living reef, often become a hazard to it.
- To keep their camera still, they frequently hold on to
or settle onto coral
- extension tubes and framers cost a fraction of what
wide-angle lens cost, so new photographers purchase these items first.
Unfortunately, these close up photo accessories require divers to even
closer approaches to the living reef
- Fins, gloved hands, knees, even scuba tanks become
instruments of destruction, and the delicate beauty these new photographers
are seeking to record is slaughtered wholesale
Extension tube set-ups
require additional care, as they increase the possibility that amphibious
cameras may flood – which is really expensive and frustrating.
It is important to point
out, that while we do not tolerate clumsy people killing and maiming kitty cats
and bunny rabbits – even if doing so is not intentional - we all too often seem indifferent when divers kill or maim
the creatures of the living reef. We cannot and will not tolerate clumsy
divers, with or without cameras, killing or maiming the reef.
Underwater video is not as
expensive as many divers think. A relatively high quality camcorder and
underwater housing can be obtained for under $2000. Furthermore:
- Underwater video does not require complicated
adjustments or lighting techniques. This makes results more predictable.
- As movement is part of video’s attraction, the
ability to remain motionless under water is not critical. This may help to
reduce the videographer’s impact on the environment.
- As mentioned above, the cost of a two hour videotape
is about the cost of a single roll of film and processing. Unlike the film,
videotape can be re-used.
Mastering still
photography takes years; mastering underwater videography, a matter of hours.
Our recommendation to new divers is : Master videography first. After your
skills develop, progress to still photography.
|